Yes, Cyberstalking and Online Harassment
Can Be Criminal

← Back to Blogs
woman looking at smart phone with frown of concern

Most people think of stalking as something that happens in person — someone following another person, showing up uninvited, or watching from a distance. While that type of behavior is clearly concerning to law enforcement, Idaho law has moved well beyond that narrow definition of stalking. Today, conduct that happens entirely online, through a phone, or across social media platforms can result in serious criminal charges. It even has its own name: cyberstalking.

Sullivan Law Office is a criminal defense firm based in Coeur d'Alene that serves clients throughout North Idaho. Charges involving electronic communication and online conduct are an increasingly common part of our criminal defense practice. If you have been accused of cyberstalking, online harassment, or related conduct in Idaho, you may be facing felony charges, a protective order, and consequences that extend far beyond what you might expect from something that happened on a device. Here is a quick rundown of what can get you into trouble under Idaho's cyberstalking statutes.

How Idaho Law Defines Stalking

Idaho's stalking statute is found at Idaho Code Sections 18-7905 and 18-7906, which establish two degrees of stalking with different penalty levels. Understanding the difference between them matters enormously for anyone facing these charges.

Second-degree stalking under Idaho Code Section 18-7905 occurs when a person knowingly and maliciously engages in a course of conduct that seriously alarms, annoys, or harasses the victim in a way that would cause substantial emotional distress in a reasonable person. For a first offense, it is a misdemeanor, but it becomes a felony upon a second conviction or if the defendant was subject to a no-contact or protective order at the time of the conduct.

First-degree stalking under Idaho Code Section 18-7906 involves the same course of conduct but with aggravating factors, which may include:

First-degree stalking is a felony, carrying potential imprisonment of up to five years and fines of up to $10,000.

The Critical Definition: "Course of Conduct"

One of the most important elements in Idaho's stalking law is the phrase "course of conduct." The statute defines this as a pattern of conduct consisting of two or more acts over a period of time, however short, that evidences a continuity of purpose. This definition has significant implications for online conduct.

For example, sending two messages that the recipient finds alarming can qualify. Posting about someone twice on social media in a way that is intended to harass or that causes substantial emotional distress can qualify. Repeated attempts to contact someone through different platforms after being told to stop can qualify. The law does not require that the defendant physically approach the victim or even that the defendant know where the victim lives. It requires a pattern, and in the digital age, patterns form quickly.

Does that mean that asking a girl out on a date twice and being rejected twice because she does not like you constitutes a violation of law? No. The conduct has to be such that the behavior is objectively alarming to a reasonable person. Not every unwanted approach qualifies as stalking.

Idaho's Electronic Communications Harassment Statute

Beyond the stalking statutes, Idaho Code Section 18-6710 specifically addresses harassment through electronic communications. This statute is broad:

Any person who, with intent to annoy, terrify, threaten, intimidate, harass, or offend, contacts another via telecommunication, email, text message, or any other form of electronic communication and (a) addresses to or about such person any obscene, lewd, or profane language, or makes any request, suggestion, or proposal that is obscene, lewd, lascivious, or indecent; or (b) addresses to such other person any threat to inflict injury or physical harm to the person or property of the person addressed or any member of his family, or any other person; or (c) by repeated anonymous or identified telecommunications, emails, text messages, or any other form of electronic communication [. . . ] disturbs the peace or attempts to disturb the peace, quiet, or right of privacy of any person at the place where the telecommunication, email, text message, or any other form of electronic communication is received

Clearly, this law covers a wide range of conduct that many people might not think of as criminal. Warning: it is. Repeatedly messaging someone who has asked you to stop, sending threatening or obscene messages through a social media platform, contacting someone through multiple accounts or under a fake name to get around a block, and making comments on public posts that are designed to threaten or terrorize a specific person all can form the basis of a criminal charge in Idaho, even if you live 100 miles from the victim and have never seen or met them in person.

Federal Law and When It Applies

Cyberstalking and online harassment can also trigger federal criminal charges under 18 U.S.C. Section 2261A, which prohibits using electronic communications to engage in a course of conduct that places a person in reasonable fear of death or serious bodily injury, or causes substantial emotional distress. Federal charges can apply when the conduct crosses state lines, which is almost always the case with internet-based communication, since servers, platforms, and users are rarely all located in the same state.

Federal cyberstalking charges are potentially more serious than state cases. Penalties can include up to five years in federal prison for a first offense, and significantly more if the conduct involved threats of violence or occurred in conjunction with other federal offenses. Anyone who believes their case involves only a minor online dispute should understand that federal prosecutors have jurisdiction and that they will use it to stop abusive online conduct.

Protective Orders and Their Criminal Implications

When someone is accused of cyberstalking or online harassment in Idaho, the alleged victim can petition the court for a civil protection order under Idaho Code Section 39-6306. These orders can prohibit all contact — direct or indirect — and include restrictions on social media contact, contact through third parties, and any form of electronic or personal communication.

Violating a protection order is a separate criminal offense under Idaho Code Section 18-920, even if you don't believe you are guilty of harassment. Once the order is in place, violation of it is criminal without regard to any other underlying allegation. Critically, the same dynamic applies in cyberstalking cases as in domestic violence cases: the existence of a protection order escalates any subsequent stalking conduct from second-degree to first-degree, turning a misdemeanor into a felony. A single additional message sent after a protection order is in place can fundamentally change the nature of the charges — and punishments — a defendant faces.

Common Situations That Lead to These Charges

Cyberstalking and online harassment charges arise in a wide variety of circumstances, and not always the ones people imagine. They come up in the context of:

In all of these situations, what started as an argument or an emotional reaction, or even what started as 'trolling' or an attempt to 'own' another individual can become a criminal matter under Idaho and/or federal law.

These Cases Require Experienced Defense Advocates

Cyberstalking and online harassment cases present unique defense challenges and opportunities. Digital evidence — screenshots, message logs, metadata, IP records, and platform data — must be carefully analyzed. Context also matters a great deal; statements that appear threatening in isolation may look very different in their full context. The intent element of many of these charges is also a meaningful area for defense: the statute requires knowing and malicious conduct, and there are cases where the evidence does not support that standard.

There are also important First Amendment considerations in cases that involve speech rather than direct threats. Not all offensive, angry, or uncomfortable communication constitutes criminal harassment, and the line between protected expression and criminal conduct is one that defense attorneys who understand both constitutional law and Idaho's specific statutes are equipped to argue.

A defendant who faces these charges without legal representation is unlikely to know how to challenge the digital evidence, raise constitutional defenses, negotiate with prosecutors over intent and context, or push back against a protection order that has been obtained based on a one-sided account of events.

If you have been charged with cyberstalking or electronic harassment in North Idaho — or if you have received notice that a protection order has been filed against you — do not wait to get legal help. These cases move quickly and your rights can be impacted long before a case comes to trial. Even more, the difference between a misdemeanor and a felony can hinge on what happens in the first days after charges are filed.

Sullivan Law Office represents clients throughout North Idaho, including Kootenai, Bonner, Boundary, and Shoshone counties who are facing either Idaho or federal criminal charges. Contact us immediately to schedule a consultation if you are arrested, facing criminal cyberstalking charges, or are the recipient of a protective order. The sooner you have an experienced criminal defense attorney in your corner, the more effectively we can protect your rights and your future.

This article is for general informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice.